660 So. 2d 711 - Rivera v. Bundschuh’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
44 state decisions
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conditions of probation not set out in the general conditions portion of the rules need be specifically pronounced at sentencing. III. CONCLUSION Accordingly, we answer the certified question in the affirmative, quash that portion of the district court decision that struck general probation conditions found in the order of probation form but not announced at sentencing, and remand for proceedings consistent herewith. It is so ordered. GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] This provision forbids a convicted felon”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.