¶1We affirm the trial court’s non-final order granting the plaintiffs motion in limine to limit the evidence presented at trial on the issue of breach of oral lease solely to damages. In Munshower v. Martin, 641 So.2d 909, 911 (Fla. 3d DCA1994), this court previously determined that the buyer, the plaintiff below, is entitled to specific performance of the purchase and sale contract and consequently, to the damages that flow from the seller’s refusal to close.
¶2Affirmed.