Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 660 SW2D 273 - State v. Sanders

State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnson · State v. Nickens · State v. Foster · State v. Mensah · State v. Camlen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Due to the trial judge’s superior opportunity to observe and weigh the prejudicial effect, if any, of counsel’s closing argument, the trial court is afforded wide discretion in controlling the scope of closing arguments.... A reviewing court is limited to determining whether the trial court abused its discretion as a matter of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.