State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017 · most notably Caspari Superintendent Missouri Eastern Correctional Center et al Bohlen (1994), State v. Cobb (1994)
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Whalen v. United States · United States v. DiFrancesco · Ball v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he principle from Leake must not be taken out of context. It is not to be applied to hold that the state has met its burden by the proof of any two prior felony convictions. It is applicable where the record, by reason of dates, geography and the nature of the offenses, in the absence of contrary evidence, supports a finding beyond a reasonable doubt the two offenses occurred at different times. It has been so applied in State v. Daniels, 655 S.W.2d 106 (Mo.App.1983); State v. Thornton, supra; State v. Cullen, 646 S.W.2d 850 (Mo.App.1982); State v. Leake, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pickett“there is no per se rule against such.” State v. Lee, 660 S.W.2d 394, 398 (Mo. App. S.D. 1983) (quoting State v. Carroll, 543 S.W.2d 48, 51 (Mo. App. 1976)). The U.S. Supreme Court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n all events, this court is constrained to follow the procedure on this issue clearly mandated by the decisions of the Supreme Court of Missouri first cited above.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bohlen v. Caspari
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.