Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 661 A2D 144 - In Re Webster

In Re Webster’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2016

5 state decisions

20199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · A.H. Robins Co. v. Maressa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conduct was deliberate and calculated... . [Webster] cleverly manipulated the flow of information between the District of Columbia, Florida and Palau in order to practice law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.