Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 661 A.2d 948 - State v. Hightower

State v. Hightower’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2018

20 state decisions

110199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Jones v. United States · United States v. Matlock · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Minnesota v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, commonsense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the ‘veracity’ and ‘basis of knowledge’ of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. And the duty of a reviewing court is simply to ensure that the magistrate had a ‘substantial basis for * * * concluding]’ that probable cause existed.” Id. at 238-39 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 (citing Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 271 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (I960)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The defense of double jeopardy and all other defenses and objections based on defects in the institution of the prosecution or in the indictment, information, or complaint other than that it fails to show jurisdiction in the court or to charge an offense may be raised only by motion before trial. The motion shall include all such defenses and objections then available to the defendant. Failure to present any such defense or objection as herein provided constitutes a waiver thereof, but the court for cause shown may grant relief from the waiver.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “what is necessary for the security of the participants in a trial whether in a courtroom or outside the courtroom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.