Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 661 F.2d 119 - Visioneering Construction Visioneering Construction and Development Company v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty

Visioneering Construction Visioneering Construction and Development Company v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty’s Empirical Analysis

661 F.2d 119 · 1981

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Benny v. Pipes (1986), Rubin v. Belo Broadcasting Corp. (1985)

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

1701981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers · Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · Desist v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once a notice of appeal is filed jurisdiction is vested in the Court of Appeals, and the trial court thereafter has no power to modify its judgment in the case or proceed further except by leave of the Court of Appeals.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “bent over backward, including ... setting over hearings on the motion to enter default to give [the debtor] another chance to comply with discovery orders.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “near total refusal to facilitate discovery.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.