Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 661 F.2d 391 - Baty v. Balkcom

Baty v. Balkcom’s Empirical Analysis

661 F.2d 391 · 1981

Citation profile

176
cited by 176 later decisions
8
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

90 federal appellate · 1 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 176 later decisions — most recently June 2007 · most notably Scarpa v. Dubois (1994), Washington v. Strickland (1982)

90 federal appellate · 1 district · 21 state decisions

1330198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Gideon v. Wainwright · Townsend v. Sain · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Holloway v. Arkansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 176 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An actual conflict exists if counsel's introduction of probative evidence or plausible arguments that would significantly benefit one defendant would damage the defense of another defendant whom the same counsel is representing.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must demonstrate that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]hen counsel is confronted with an actual conflict of interest, prejudice must be presumed, and except under the most extraordinary circumstances, the error cannot be considered harmless.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.