Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 661 F.3d 1 - Seven-Sky v. Holder

Seven-Sky v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

661 F.3d 1 · 2011

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
August 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 10 district ·

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1314 · 26 U.S.C. § 5000A · 26 U.S.C. § 527 · 26 U.S.C. § 6038 · 26 U.S.C. § 6151 · 26 U.S.C. § 6201 · 26 U.S.C. § 6203 · 26 U.S.C. § 6213

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · United States v. Nixon · United States v. Salerno · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The[ plaintiffs] seek injunctive and declaratory relief to prevent anyone from being subject to the mandate, irrespective of whether they intend to comply with it, and irrespective of the means Congress chooses to implement it. The harms appellants allege ... exist as a result of the mandate, not the penalty.... True, ... the penalty would be a serious financial burden. But that harm affects only the limited class of individuals who fail to comply when the mandate goes into effect.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Today, the only recognized limitations [on Congress's Commerce Clause authority] are that (1) Congress may not regulate non- economic behavior based solely on an attenuated link to interstate commerce, and (2) Congress may not regulate intrastate economic behavior if its aggregate impact on interstate commerce is negligible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[t]he harms appellants allege ... exist as a result of the [ACA coverage] mandate, not the penalty. ... The individual mandate and the shared responsibility payment create different legal obligations, for different categories of people, at different times.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.