Thurman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hutchinson v. State · Braswell v. State · Washington v. State · Baran v. State · Daum v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The person to be tested must have had nothing to eat or drink, must not have put any foreign substance in his or her mouth or respiratory tract, and must not smoke within twenty (20) minutes prior to the time a breath sample is taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stewart v. State“The person to be tested must have had nothing to eat or drink, must not have put any foreign substance in his or her mouth or respiratory tract, and must not smoke within twenty (20) minutes to the time a breath sample is taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Molnar“Thus, the State must establish the proper procedure and demonstrate that the operator followed the procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stewart v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.