661 So. 2d 1117 - Magee v. Magee’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 824 So. 2d 583 - Hensarling v. Hensarling (2002), 771 So. 2d 341 - Heigle v. Heigle (2000)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson · 639 So. 2d 909 - Hemsley v. Hemsley · 650 So. 2d 1281 - Johnson v. Johnson · Brabham v. Brabham · 563 So. 2d 594 - Bell v. Parker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unmistakable, clear, plain, or indisputable.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Watson v. Watson · Lowrey v. Lowrey“Our scope of review in domestic relations matters is limited under the familiar rule that this Court will not disturb a chancellor's findings unless manifestly wrong, clearly erroneous, or if the chancellor applied an erroneous legal standard.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“This Court will not disturb the findings of a chancellor unless the chancellor was manifestly wrong, clearly erroneous or an erroneous legal standard was applied.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.