Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

661 So. 2d 123

Cohen v. Cohen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 5, 1995

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-10-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2013

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Based upon our examination of the record and argument of counsel, we agree with the husband that the trial court erred in requiring the husband to pay all of the prospective Hillel education costs for the children. Instead, the trial court should have held each party responsible for payment of one-half the costs thereof. The other points are not preserved or are without merit.

¶2Affirmed in part, and reversed in part, and remanded.

/661/so2d/123 · .json · Public domain