Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

661 So. 2d 304

661 So.2d 304

20 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 537

Florida Bar v. Warren

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 12, 1995

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1995-10-12

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1997

5 state decisions

Relies on 655 So. 2d 1131 - The Florida Bar v. Warren

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This Court previously enjoined respondent from the unlicensed practice of law. Florida Bar v. Warren, 655 So.2d 1131 (Fla.1995). At the same time we entered an order to show cause why respondent should not be ordered to pay restitution to those individuals who paid for his purported legal services. Thereafter, respondent filed a statement in response to the order to show cause. The Court notes that the Rules Governing the Investigation and Prosecution of the Unlicensed Practice of Law contained in chapter 10 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar contain no provision authorizing the ordering of restitution. Upon consideration, the order .to show cause is hereby discharged. Those persons aggrieved by respondent’s action may seek redress through civil proceedings. The injunction against respondent remains in full force and effect.

¶2It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
/661/so2d/304 · .json · Public domain