Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 661 SO2D 652 - Freeman v. Humble

Freeman v. Humble’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · 622 So. 2d 748 - Holmes v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. · Holmes v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. · 633 So. 2d 755 - White v. Touro Infirmary · Phillips v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]roceeding to trial when there is an error which does not have an effect on the fact finding process but can nullify the entire proceeding, is a tremendous waste of judicial time and resources.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Courts of this state have consistently held that a party to a civil suit who seeks review of a Batson/Edmonson issue must do so by an application for supervisory writs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “no right to appellate review of [a Batson ] issue,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.