Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 661 SO2D 673 - State v. Willars

State v. Willars’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. White (1996), 966 So. 2d 139 - State v. Ellis (2007)

83 state decisions

530199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Hudson v. Louisiana · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · 436 So. 2d 471 - State v. Sutton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A convicted defendant's claim that counsel's assistance was so defective as to require reversal of a conviction ... has two components. First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient ... Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “All persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether present or absent, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, aid and a bet in its commission, or directly or indirectly counsel or procure another to commit the crime, are principals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.