State v. George’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably 885 So. 2d 1044 - State v. Manning (2004), 688 So. 2d 657 - State v. Ingram (1997)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Doyle v. Ohio · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Lockhart v. Nelson · Hudson v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the use for impeachment purposes of [the defendant's] silence at the time of arrest, and after receiving Miranda warnings....”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“laiThis court has expressed its disapproval of placing before the jury evidence that the police advised the defendant of his Miranda rights at the time of his arrest when the testimony does not establish a predicate for admitting a subsequent oral or written inculpatory statement and thereby invites jurors to consider the defendant’s post-arrest silence as an impeachment of an exculpatory account later offered at trial. State v. Mosley, 390 So.2d 1302 (La.1980); Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 , 96 S.Ct. 2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.