Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 661 S.W.2d 113 - Hall v. State

Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Culberson v. Mississippi · Esquivel v. State · Stark v. State · Smith v. State · Latham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial judge, upon the demand of the defendant or his attorney, or of the State’s counsel, shall cause the names of all the members of the general panel drawn or assigned as jurors in such case to be placed in a receptacle and well-shaken, and the clerk shall draw therefrom the names of a sufficient number of jurors from which a jury may be selected to try such case, and such names shall be written, in the order drawn, on the jury list from which the jury is to be selected to try such case, and write the names as drawn upon two slips of paper and deliver one slip to the State’s counsel and the other to the defendant or his attorney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We held in Hall, supra, that: “in capital murder cases which do not involve a special venire, see Art. 34.01, supra, when timely and properly requested, the accused is entitled to have the names of those persons assigned to and seated in the courtroom where the cause is to be heard, shuffled or redrawn. In denying [defendant’s] request to have the first ‘mini jury panel’ of prospective jurors assigned to and seated in the courtroom shuffled or redrawn, the trial judge reversibly erred.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.