Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 661 SW2D 288 - Brooks v. Bachus

Brooks v. Bachus’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2003

22 state decisions

130198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Greene v. Louisville & Interurban Railroad · Law v. People ex rel. Huck · Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Anderson · Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Minnesota · Simpson v. Pontotoc Common County Line School Dist. No. 31

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) in defense to a suit to enforce collection of delinquent taxes; or (2) as a basis of a claim for relief in a suit by the property owner to arrest or prevent the tax collection process or to obtain a refund of taxes paid.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “42.06. Notice of Appeal (a) To exercise his right of appeal, a party must file written notice of appeal within 15 days after the date he receives the notice required by Section 41.47 or, in the case of a taxing unit, by Section 41.07 of this code that the order appealed has been issued. (b) The notice must be filed with the body that issued the order appealed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The Texas Property Tax Code, by its detailed provisions, meets the challenged requirement of due process. Plaintiffs failed to avail themselves of the procedures provided. Their point of error is overruled. The judgment of dismissal is affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.