Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 A2D 867 - In Re Abrams

In Re Abrams’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2011

2 district · 4 state decisions

30199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 2 U.S.C. § 192

Relies on Carafas v. J · In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · Brown v. Walker · Ex parte Garland · United States v. Klein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[THE CHAIRMAN]: Do you know if any foreign government is helping to supply the Contras? There is a report in the L.A. paper, for example, that the Saudis are. [MR. GEORGE]: [ 3 ] No sir, we have no intelligence of that. [MR. ABRAMS]: I can only speak on that question for the last fifteen months when I have been in this job, and that story about the Saudis to my knowledge is false. I personally cannot tell you about pre-1985, but in 1985-1986, when I have been around, no. [THE CHAIRMAN]: Is it also false with respect to other governments as well? [MR. ABRAMS]: Yes, it is also false.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “I was, until today, fairly confident that there was no foreign government contributing to this. But I knew nothing, still don’t know anything, about the mechanisms by which money was transferred from private groups that have been raising it, to the Contras.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.