Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 F.2d 1378 - United States v. Burns

United States v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis

662 F.2d 1378 · 1981

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably United States v. Pepe (1984), United States v. Lipscomb (2002)

30 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

2401981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Barker v. Wingo · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Sedillo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the rule under which the trial court and appellate courts are bound by any findings of fact or conclusions of law made by the appellate courts in a prior appeal of the case at issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “For speedy trial considerations to outweigh such factors [convenience] they should be set forth in findings sufficiently detailed to allow review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In any case involving a defendant charged with an offense, the appropriate judicial officer, at the earliest practicable time, shall, after consultation with the counsel for the defendant and the attorney for the Government, set the case for trial on a day certain, or list it for trial on a weekly or other short-term trial calendar at a place within the judicial district, so as to assure a speedy trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.