Krische v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
662 F.2d 177 · 1981
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Voutour v. Vitale (1985), United States v. Frazin (1986)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Picard v. Connor · Allen v. United States · Bollenbach v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he several decisions in this circuit reviewing the conduct of a trial judge in sending messages to a deliberating jury without notice to defendant or his counsel uniformly ha[ve] been decided without any significant distinction between the two standards,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he opportunity to participate in the drafting of a proper form of Allen charge was lost”). 50 . See Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 105-06 , 54 S.Ct. 330 , 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bradshaw v. State“has found reversible error by applying only the Kotteakos standard”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.