Salinas v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
662 F.2d 345 · 1981
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably McCoy v. Schweiker (1982), Vazquez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1982)
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Harris · Perez v. Schweiker · Rodriguez v. Schweiker · Anderson v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether such work exists in the immediate area in which (the applicant) lives, or whether a specific job vacancy exists for him, or whether he would be hired if he applied for work.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Broz v. Schweiker“'Work which exists in the national economy' means work which exists in significant numbers either in the region where such individual lives or in several regions of the country.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Broz v. Schweiker“because the [additional medical reports] are ambiguous, conclusory, and apparently unsupported by clinical data.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dorsey v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.