Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 F.2d 584 - Aronsen v. Crown Zellerbach

Aronsen v. Crown Zellerbach’s Empirical Analysis

662 F.2d 584 · 1981

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

80 federal appellate · 26 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Miller v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. (1985), Rasimas v. Michigan Department of Mental Health (1983)

80 federal appellate · 26 district · 2 state decisions

10301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. American Trucking Associations · Delaware State College v. Ricks · Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill · Lorillard v. Pons · Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “inquiry for purposes of determining when the limitations period begins to run must center on the date when the employee has notice of the unlawful act; neither cessation of work nor official termination noted on company personnel records is singularly relevant to this inquiry.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “neither an appellate court nor a trial court are permitted to weigh the evidence, pass upon credibility, or speculate as to the ultimate findings of fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[A] court should not add language to an unambiguous statute absent a manifest error in drafting or unresolvable inconsistency.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.