Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 F.2d 710 - Holifield v. Davis

Holifield v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

662 F.2d 710 · 1981

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Michigan v. · Desist v. United States · Balistrieri v. United States · Watkins v. Sowders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Constitution does not require a per se rule compelling state criminal courts to conduct a hearing out of the jury's presence whenever a defendant contends that a witness's identification of him was arrived at improperly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.