United States v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
662 F.2d 777 · 1980
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2021
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Glasser v. United States · Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia · McMann v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when counsel's duty to his client calls for a course of action which concern for himself suggests that he avoid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“expect an attorney to vigorously attack his own prior representation of a client,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.