Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 F.2d 853 - McGinness v. Interstate Commerce Commission

McGinness v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis

662 F.2d 853 · 1981

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
April 2004
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2004

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

180198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 45 U.S.C. § 744 · 49 U.S.C. § 10101 (Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982) · 49 U.S.C. § 10102 · 49 U.S.C. § 10903 · 49 U.S.C. § 11322

Relies on Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham · Zuber v. Allen · United States v. Reliable Transfer Co. · Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate Cases

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) In a matter related to a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission under this subchapter, the Commission shall exempt a person, a class of persons, or a transaction or service when the Commission finds that the application of a provision of this subtitle— (1) is not necessary to carry out the transportation policy of section 10101a of this title; and (2) either (A) the transaction or service is of limited scope, or (B) the application of a provision of this subtitle is not needed to protect shippers from the abuse of market power.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.