Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 F.3d 1114 - Stein v. Ryan

Stein v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis

662 F.3d 1114 · 2011

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mathews v. Eldridge · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pearson v. Callahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[There is] no authority requiring prison officials to review sentencing orders independently to make sure the court got it right.”); Valdez, 878 F.2d at 1289 (prison officials have no duty”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.