Baird v. Gotbaum’s Empirical Analysis
662 F.3d 1246 · 2011
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 97 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). Id. at 118, 122 S.Ct. 2061 (excluding any incident that”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“'[A] plaintiff may not combine discrete acts to form a hostile work environment claim without meeting the required hostile work environment standard,' but a hostile work environment claim is not rendered invalid 'merely because it contains discrete acts that the plaintiff claims (correctly or incorrectly) are actionable on their own.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.