Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
662 F.3d 1265 · 2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts · Allstate Insurance v. Hague · 51 Cal. 4th 1191 - Sullivan v. Oracle Corp. · 112 Cal. App. 4th 16 - California School of Culinary Arts v. Lujan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'California applies its Labor Code equally to work performed in California, whether that work is performed by California residents or by out-of-state residents.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]here is no plausible Dormant Commerce Clause argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.