Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 F.3d 708 - United States v. Melancon

United States v. Melancon’s Empirical Analysis

662 F.3d 708 · 2011

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Stansbury v. California · United States v. Watts · Maryland v. Shatzer · United States v. Bengivenga

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A) prison inmate is not automatically always in 'custody' within the meaning of Miranda.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is an objective one-the subjective intent of the questioners and the subjective fear of the questioned person are irrelevant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'there is a 'formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement' of the degree associated with a formal arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.