Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 F.3d 994 - Williams v. Hobbs

Williams v. Hobbs’s Empirical Analysis

662 F.3d 994 · 2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
August 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Wolff v. McDonnell · United States v. Mendenhall · Sandin v. Conner · Hewitt v. Helms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We conclude that an award of $ 1.44 for each constitutional violation is a sufficient nominal damage award....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Thus, based on this 'per-constitutional-violation' analysis ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.