John Doe, I v. Daniel Cummins’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Ex Parte: Edward T Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) 'facts sufficient to cast some articulable doubt on the accuracy of the outcome of the disciplinary proceeding' and (2) a 'particularized ... causal connection between the flawed outcome and gender bias.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a similarly-situated member of the opposite sex was treated more favorably than the plaintiff due to his or her gender.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a full-scale adversarial proceeding is not required.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.