Cullotta v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Califano v. Sanders · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Bowen v. Yuckert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“referring to the Title 42 numbering rather than to the Act’s internal numbering. Regulations drawn from 20 C.F.R. will be cited”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“That is especially true where (as here) an AU points to numerous reasons for believing the applicant’s complaints exaggerated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to determinations made prior to January 1, 1987” {id. § 3(a)(3)). 13 . [Footnote by this Court] That”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.