662 So. 2d 1227 - Rowe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2011
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`Any inconsistencies and conflicts in the evidence were for the jury to resolve. This court is not a finder of fact and will not second-guess juries in their conclusions as to the facts of a case. "`[V]erdicts rendered [on conflicting evidence] are conclusive upon appeal.' Johnson v. State , 555 So.2d 818 , 820 (Ala.Cr.App.l989[)]." Dailey v. State , 604 So.2d 436 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992). See also Woods v. State , 592 So.2d 631 (Ala.Cr.App.), writ quashed, 592 So.2d 636 (Ala. 1991).'"”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"In Determining whether there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the trial court, we must accept as true the evidence introduced by the state, accord the State all legitimate inferences therefrom, and view the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Dailey v. State , 604 So.2d 436 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992). See also Woods v. State , 592 So.2d 631 (Ala.Cr.App.), writ quashed, 592 So.2d 636 (Ala. 1991).'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.