Miracle Center Dev. v. Mad Const.’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2013
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Yates v. Ball · 315 So. 2d 518 - Tobin & Tobin Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Zeskind · 243 So. 2d 605 - Solutec Corp. v. Young & Lawrence Associates, Inc. · 432 So. 2d 656 - Van D. Costas, Inc. v. Rosenberg · Buker, Et Ux. v. Webster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A contractor must substantially comply with the statutory provisions governing a mechanic's lien before the lien may be foreclosed. Masterbilt Corp. v. S.A. Ryan Motors, Inc., 149 Fla. 644 , 6 So.2d 818, 820 (1942); see Browne v. Park, 144 Fla. 696 , 198 So. 462 (1940); Buker v. Webster, 140 Fla. 471 , 191 So. 835 (1939); Southern Paint Mfg. Co. v. Crump, 132 Fla. 799 , 182 So. 291 (1938).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Grant v. Wester
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.