Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 SO2D 722 - Swenszkowski v. Compton

Swenszkowski v. Compton’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 589 So. 2d 225 - Spohr v. Berryman · 106 Cal. App. 2d 694 - Sperry v. Tammany · 439 So. 2d 280 - In Re Estate of Kulow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are not subject to the probate code's statutes of nonclaim”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.