Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 SO2D 736 - Sprankle v. State

Sprankle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2016

17 state decisions

130199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 591 So. 2d 930 - Karchesky v. State · 649 So. 2d 230 - Ocean Village Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Brooks · Fernandez v. Fernandez · Carter v. State · Burrows v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a corrected scoresheet places the defendant in a different cell, the error cannot be presumed to be harmless, unless the record conclusively demonstrates that the trial court would have given the same sentence had it known the correct score”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “still within the permitted range of punishment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.