Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 SO2D 758 - Griner v. State

Griner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Griffin v. State · Crossley v. State · 565 So. 2d 328 - Erickson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the present case the facts of the first event were not "inextricably intertwined" with, or "necessary to adequately describe" the second event. The most we can say about the relationship between these two events is that one occurred very soon after the other, which is not sufficient to make the evidence regarding the first incident admissible under Griffin , particularly when we weigh the danger of unfair prejudice to defendant against the relevancy of the evidence (citations omitted). Nor can we say that the admission of this evidence was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt under State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.