Tucker v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 388 So. 2d 377 - Dubroc v. Dubroc · 21 Ariz. App. 173 - State Ex Rel. Arvayo v. Guerrero · 92 Ill. App. 3d 699 - People Ex Rel. Oetjen v. Oetjen · 375 So. 2d 875 - Ray v. Pentlicki · 83 Ill. App. 3d 1062 - Super v. Armstrong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a)ny hardship that this may place on the support obligor is. . . . an unavoidable corollary of the legal principle that a parent's duty to support a child is of paramount importance under the law and continues until the child reaches the age of majority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.