662 So. 2d 975 - State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on California v. Hodari D. · Perez v. State · Owen v. State · 620 So. 2d 1242 - Hollinger v. State · 596 So. 2d 98 - Grant v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress comes to this court with a presumption of correctness and that we must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to sustaining these conclusions."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. RM · State v. R.M.“"In this case ... we must reverse because there is no basis in the record for sustaining the ruling even after affording the trial court the presumption of correctness."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. RM · State v. R.M.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.