Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 SW2D 484 - Holbrook v. Commonwealth

Holbrook v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Trowel v. Commonwealth · United States v. Blanton · United States v. Blanton · Pinion v. State · Gatlin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[C]onsent to' or `authorize' as used in [KRS 531.310] does not require an affirmative act to cause Diaz to participate in the movie. To employ or induce a minor to engage in the performance of sexual acts would necessitate such an affirmative act; however, the definition of the offense is not limited to such affirmative acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Indeed, `employs, consents to, authorizes or induces' all imply the possibility of voluntary participation by a minor, as the idea or force or coercion is not ordinarily conveyed by those words.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.