Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 662 S.W.2d 677 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Anthony J. Demma, United States of America v. Henry Brulay · Williams v. State · Green v. State · Roy v. State · Sirls v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Conduct is justified if: (1) the actor reasonably believes the conduct is immediately necessary to avoid imminent harm; (2) the desirability and urgency of avoiding the harm clearly outweigh, according to ordinary standards of reasonableness, the harm sought to be prevented by the law proscribing the conduct; and (3) a legislative purpose to exclude the justification claimed for the conduct does not otherwise plainly appear.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.