Webb v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2018
4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Allen v. United States · Geders v. United States · Brooks v. Tennessee · Pauley v. Beth-Energy Mines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]rom the commencement until the conclusion of a deposition, ... the attorney(s) for the deponent shall not ... consult or confer with the deponent regarding the substance of the testimony already given or anticipated to be given except for the purpose of conferring on whether to assert a privilege against testifying or on how to comply with a court order”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Buckham v. State“forthright application to the court for a special ruling permitting limited consultation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Buckham v. State“on what to say, or not say, or how-to-say-it, or how to control or”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Buckham v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.