Hays v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
663 F.2d 1004 · 1981
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 2006 · most notably State v. Tyler (1990), Franz Ex Rel. Simmons v. State (1988)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Kent v. United States · Keeble v. United States · Brown v. Texas · Wilkins v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`capacity to appreciate his position and make a rational choice with respect to continuing or abandoning further litigation or on the other hand whether he is suffering from a mental disease, disorder, or defect which may substantially affect his capacity in the premises.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“there was not sufficient opportunity for proper psychiatric and psychological evaluation”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brewer v. Lewis · Brewer v. Lewis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.