United States v. Torres’s Empirical Analysis
663 F.2d 1019 · 1981
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 7 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably United States v. Barlow (1982), Albright v. Rodriguez (1995)
26 federal appellate · 7 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1202 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3041 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · McNabb v. United States · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Mallory v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that federal courts in their supervisory power over the administration of justice in the federal arena must exclude confessions obtained during a period of undue delay in bringing the defendants before a magistrate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 5(a) becomes applicable once the accused is taken into federal custody.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Unquestionably, [the defendant] gave his voluntary consent when he signed the form which was provided him. This explained that a complete search was to be made, and thus, of course, it logically follows permission to search contemplates a thorough search. If not thorough it is of little value. A complete search was authorized, and it should have been anticipated that it would be a careful one, although the defendant may have thought that the officers might overlook the money.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Olivas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.