Exxon Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission’s Empirical Analysis
663 F.2d 120 · 1980
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 52 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 118 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Perry v. Block (1982), State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of Cleveland (1988)
31 federal appellate · 52 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Goland v. Central Intelligence Agency · Jordan v. United States Department of Justice · National Cable Television Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]onclusory allegations unsupported by factual data will not create a triable issue of fact.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is to determine whether any pertinent factual controversy exists, and in reviewing the record before it, the district court must give the party against whom the motion is made the most favorable view of the record if there is doubt as to the sufficiency of a factual showing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may refuse the application for [summary] judgment or may order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Messina v. Krakower
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.