Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 663 F.2d 1312 - Thorton v. Schweiker

Thorton v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

663 F.2d 1312 · 1981

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2017

5 federal appellate ·

801981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James Hess, Jr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America · Chaney v. Schweiker · Ware v. Schweiker · In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n order to prevent a miscarriage of justice, we conclude ... that once the Social Security Administration received [claimant's] letters requesting assistance in obtaining specific medical and psychological records, the administrative process should not have proceeded to a final decision without either some assurance from [claimant] that she no longer sought to present the records, or notice from the Social Security Administration that it would not obtain the records and that [claimant] would have ample time to acquire the records herself and file them with the ALJ for consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “This rule, however, is not inflexible and it gives way when necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.