Cornelius v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis
663 F.2d 330 · 1981
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2010
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1397 (§ 2001 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 620 (§ 420 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on King v. Smith · United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co. · System Federation No. 91 v. Wright · Wright v. Council of Emporia · Spady v. Mount Vernon Housing Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inquire into the parties' intent and the circumstances surrounding the decree in order to select the most reasonable interpretation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gilday v. Dubois“ White v. Higgins, 116 F.2d 312, 317 (1st Cir.1940) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morgan v. Burke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.