Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 663 F.2d 583 - Franks v. Associated Air Center, Inc.

Franks v. Associated Air Center, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

663 F.2d 583 · 1981

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Burger King Corp. v. Mason (1983), Brooks, Tarlton, Gilbert, Douglas & Kressler v. United States Fire Insurance (1987)

24 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

2501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Standard Oil Company v. Edward Anderson · Gerry v. United States · Brower v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that an employer gives general instructions and directions to the employee of another is not sufficient to make the latter a borrowed servant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘Unconscionable action or course of action’ means an act or practice which, to a person’s detriment: (B) results in a gross disparity between the value received and consideration paid, in a transaction involving transfer of consideration.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““There is very little law in Texas construing unconscionability as so defined [gross disparity], but one case may prove instructive.” Franks v. Associated Air Center, Inc., 663 F.2d 583, 592 (5th Cir.1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.