Laster v. AT & T Mobility LLC

Decided Nov. 21, 2011.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2011-11-21

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation (2012), Sarah Murphy v. Sfbsc Management, LLC (2019)

3 district · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion · AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-11-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Matthew B. Butler, Esquire, Craig Nicholas, Nicholas & Butler LLP, Kirk B. Hulett, Sarah P. Weber, Hulett Harper Stewart LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.

¶2Donald Manwell Falk, Mayer Brown, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Jesse M. Jauregui, Esquire, Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Evan Mark Tager, Arehis Ashok Parasharami, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, Michele A. Powers, Esquire, Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

¶3Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, STEPHEN REINHARDT, and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5The case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion in AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011).

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Counsel

Matthew B. Butler, Esquire, Craig Nicholas, Nicholas & Butler LLP, Kirk B. Hulett, Sarah P. Weber, Hulett Harper Stewart LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Donald Manwell Falk, Mayer Brown, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Jesse M. Jauregui, Esquire, Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Evan Mark Tager, Arehis Ashok Parasharami, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, Michele A. Powers, Esquire, Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.